Radicore Forum: Workflow » State Machine vs Sequential WF

Home » RADICORE development » Workflow » State Machine vs Sequential WF

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

State Machine vs Sequential WF [message #2360]

Wed, 11 November 2009 08:11

redut
Messages: 1
Registered: November 2009

Junior Member

Hi,

Microsoft Workflow Foundation supports two different concepts of workflows sequential and state-machine.

See http://windowsworkflow.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/types-of-win dows-workflows-sequential-vs-state-machine/

Is this applicable to Radicore workflow engine. What steps would be necessary to implement a state-based workflow?

Thanks for any help

[Updated on: Wed, 11 November 2009 08:40]

Report message to a moderator

Re: State Machine vs Sequential WF [message #2361 is a reply to message #2360]

Wed, 11 November 2009 09:53

AJM
Messages: 2386
Registered: April 2006
Location: Surrey, UK

Senior Member

I don't know. My activity-based workflow is good enough for my purposes, so I don't see any advantage in building another.

Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Automatic Transition
Next Topic:	Pending workflow task on Home Page

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 08 10:53:35 EST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01357 seconds