Radicore Forum: Framework » OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework

Home » RADICORE development » Framework » OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework [message #121 is a reply to message #120]

Thu, 29 June 2006 11:48

AJM
Messages: 2368
Registered: April 2006
Location: Surrey, UK

Senior Member

I use the .inc extension to indicate that that a file can only be included and not executed in its own right. This is an important difference to most people.

I include in my installation instructions the means to tell Apache not to allow access to any files which end in the '.inc' extension.

Even if these instructions were to be ignored there should be no security issues as all the critical .inc files are held in a directory which is outside the web root and are therefore totally inaccessible even if Apache were to be mis-configured.

Those .inc files which are not outside the web root are in their own separate directories which could easily be password protected or set to be inaccessible via the web server.

The OWASP recommendation does not take these other options into account, so the "security hole" is not as bad as they would make out.

Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework By: andy on Thu, 29 June 2006 11:32
		Re: OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework By: AJM on Thu, 29 June 2006 11:48
		Re: OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework By: andy on Thu, 29 June 2006 12:09
		Re: OWASP standards vs. Radicore Framework By: AJM on Thu, 29 June 2006 13:17

Previous Topic:	metadata vs. business logic
Next Topic:	Framework Version

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 23:10:30 EST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00956 seconds