Re: Workflow with optional transition? [message #3787 is a reply to message #3786] |
Wed, 03 July 2013 09:53 |
jarg
Messages: 2 Registered: July 2013 Location: Oporto
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Thanks for your answer, but I have two more questions if you don´t mind.
The first one is:
1. Why we can´t model more than 2 inwards or split (implicit) arcs from one place? what is the reason for that?
2. we are trying to model the following (please check file attached for an easier to understand description):
There are 6 arcs:
Start -> Approve, Inward, Or-Split (Implicit)
Start -> Reject, Inward, Or-Split (Implicit)
Approve->End, Outward, Sequential
Reject-> Rejected, Outward, Sequential
Rejected -> Undoreject, Inward, Sequential
Undoreject -> start, Outward, Sequential
We use arcs OR-Split(Implicit) again, but in this example we don´t need to use or-join.
This example works fine, so the question is, is it really needed or-join arcs after the OR-SPlit (implicit) arcs?
|
|
|