Radicore Forum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » RADICORE development » Framework » Is Radicore better than Ruby On Rails?
Re: Is Radicore better than Ruby On Rails? [message #431 is a reply to message #44] Wed, 29 November 2006 18:19 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
darkmatter is currently offline  darkmatter
Messages: 1
Registered: November 2006
Junior Member
> 1. Table names must be plural

Not true. This is the default behavior, but you can override it (like almost *anything* in Rails):

class MyModel
set_table_name "my_model"
end

> 2. Primary keys must be auto_increment and named 'id'

Not true. Again, this is just the (overrideable) default:

class MyModel
set_primary_key "ModelId"
end

As for the "auto_increment" part, you are free to manage your
primary keys as you want, if you really want. There are even
plugins to handle composite primary keys.

> 3. Candidate keys must be ... ?

This is not very clear. What do you need candidate keys for when
you have a primary key? Maybe you should explain yourself better.

> 4. Relationships are inferred from foreign key names

Not true. Again, you seem to have a hard time distinguishing
the (very reasonable) Rails defaults from hard-coded conventions.

class MyModel
has_may :other_models, :foreign_key => "an_elephant"
end

> 5. Intersection tables in Many-to-Many relationships

"...RoR cannot recognise intersection tables unless they are named according to the rule alphabeticallyFirstTablePlural_alphabeticallySecondTablePlur al. "

Not true. Same old story.

class MyModel
has_and_belongs_to_many :elephants, :join_table => "pink_elephants_for_my_model"
end

> 6. Primary data validation

True, but nothing prevents you from writing a plugin that adds the necessary validation methods inferring them from the database schema. But the general philosophy behind Rails is that most of the business logic should be *visible* in the code. And anyway,
if you try e.g. to nullify a not-nullable column, you get a nice
exception from the database layer, which thankfully is very
easily handled in Ruby (unlike, say, in PHP4).

I would suggest that you try spending more than 1 minute on the Rails documentation and make some more amends to your document,
which at the moment relies almost entirely on wrong assumptions.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Recommendations when setting up databases
Next Topic: AJAX features
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 08 18:31:00 EST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01146 seconds