Radicore Forum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » RADICORE development » Workflow » State Machine vs Sequential WF
State Machine vs Sequential WF [message #2360] Wed, 11 November 2009 08:11 Go to next message
redut is currently offline  redut
Messages: 1
Registered: November 2009
Junior Member
Hi,

Microsoft Workflow Foundation supports two different concepts of workflows sequential and state-machine.

See http://windowsworkflow.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/types-of-win dows-workflows-sequential-vs-state-machine/

Is this applicable to Radicore workflow engine. What steps would be necessary to implement a state-based workflow?

Thanks for any help

[Updated on: Wed, 11 November 2009 08:40]

Report message to a moderator

Re: State Machine vs Sequential WF [message #2361 is a reply to message #2360] Wed, 11 November 2009 09:53 Go to previous message
AJM is currently offline  AJM
Messages: 2312
Registered: April 2006
Location: Surrey, UK
Senior Member
I don't know. My activity-based workflow is good enough for my purposes, so I don't see any advantage in building another.

Previous Topic: Automatic Transition
Next Topic: Pending workflow task on Home Page
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jan 29 08:17:04 EST 2023

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01766 seconds